Karpathy scored 342 BLS occupations on AI exposure, averaging 5.3/10, with screen-based knowledge work dominating high-exposure tiers ($3.7 trillion in annual wages). The capability gap is real and uneven: paid frontier agents (Codex, Claude Code) are crushing technical domains with verifiable rewards, while general-use cases see modest gains. Production-scale evidence confirms organizational transformation: Marcus Moretti runs Spiral solo via two files and a cron; Every grew 4→30 people while automating aggressively; Aaron Levie hires "agent engineers" wiring secure agents to Salesforce/Workday, plus matching "agent PM" roles. The traditional CPO role is predicted to vanish within five years as IC roles blend; careers now require fluency across product, design, engineering, and analytics rather than single-discipline depth. Professional services are competing with $20/month AI skills encoding judgment—tax and estate-planning tools save users $1k–$20k each. A ~$400/month multi-LLM stack (Opus for planning, GPT-5.5 for review, Playwright for validation) delivers full dev-team capabilities. OpenAI pays $280K for Forward Deployed Engineers, testing "the actual loop" over algorithms. Structurally, labor reallocates to the "relational sector" where human provenance is part of value—human-made art commands 44% exclusivity premium; AI involvement directly compresses it. Comin/Lashkari/Mestieri (Econometrica 2021) finds income effects drive 75%+ of structural change toward high-income-elasticity sectors.